border, provides an overview of the law around border search, and offers a brief technical overview to securing digital data.Īs an initial matter, readers should note that one size does not fit all. This guide (updating a previous guide from 2011 2) helps travelers understand their individual risks when crossing the U.S.
As of this writing, the federal government is considering requiring disclosure from certain foreign visitors of social media login credentials, allowing access to private postings and “friend” lists. Moreover, agents may seek to examine your public social media postings by obtaining your social media identifiers or handles.
VERACRYPT REVIEW 2017 PORTABLE
Border agents may attempt to scrutinize the content stored or cached on your phones, laptops, and other portable electronic devices, including electronic communications, social media postings, and ecommerce activity. As a matter of practice, border agents may take a broad view of what they are permitted to do. As a matter of the law, some legal protections are weaker – a fact EFF is working to change. border, however, those limits are not as strong, both legally and practically. Constitution generally places strong limits on the government’s ability to pry into this information. How can travelers keep their digital data safe? Moreover, people in many professions, such as lawyers and journalists, have a heightened need to keep their electronic information confidential. Our devices carry records of private conversations, family photos, medical documents, banking information, information about what websites we visit, and much more. Our lives are minutely documented on the phones and laptops we carry. 1 Every one of those searches was a potential privacy violation. government reported a five-fold increase in the number of electronic media searches at the border in a single year, from 4,764 in 2015 to 23,877 in 2016. By Sophia Cope, Amul Kalia, Seth Schoen, and Adam Schwartzĭownload the report as a PDF.
0 kommentar(er)
